Skip to content

How do Ruff and Pylint compare?

Ruff and Pylint are Python code analysis tools with overlapping but distinct capabilities.

Core Differences

Speed and Architecture

Ruff’s Rust implementation delivers dramatically faster performance than Pylint’s Python codebase. This speed advantage becomes particularly noticeable in large codebases where Ruff can analyze files orders of magnitude faster.

Rule Coverage

While Pylint implements approximately 409 rules, Ruff now exceeds 900 total rules, with around 209 overlapping with Pylint’s ruleset. However, these numbers continue to change, especially as Ruff undergoes rapid development.

Ruff is under active development with frequent updates and expanding capabilities. Astral also maintains ty, a static type checker for Python, which covers some of the deeper analysis that Pylint provides (such as argument validation and type inference).

Automatic Fixes

Ruff fixes many of the issues it identifies automatically. Pylint focuses on detection and reporting rather than automated correction.

Extensibility Model

The tools take different approaches to extensibility. Pylint supports a plugin system allowing custom “checkers”. Ruff implements all rules natively without plugin support.

Working Together

Projects can use both tools:

  • Ruff for fast, automated style enforcement and common patterns
  • Pylint for deeper static analysis when needed
  • Type checkers to handle advanced type validation

This combination leverages each tool’s strengths while compensating for their respective limitations.

More Information

Last updated on

Please submit corrections and feedback...